What is the role of an entrepreneur in overall economy and culture


Entrepreneur is known as a hot topic for the two academic students and people focused for business achievement. They are a team of persons that can significantly affect many aspects of economy and society. This paper will certainly critically go over the position of business people by evaluating their input to the economy and contemporary society, using illustrations from different articles within the topic.

Starting by defining the entrepreneurs being discussed, this kind of paper examines the efforts to economy from the facets of employment, innovation, productivity and growth, electricity; certain costs or drawbacks are also considered. Though the business activities of entrepreneurs generate social rewards as well, a few entrepreneurs have begun to set social problems in top priority. Labeled as cultural entrepreneurs, they are really devoted to solving social concerns. In fact all the entrepreneurs have the prospect to lead to social benefits and are supposed to achieve these types of goals, for example to implement sustainable development.

In the wake in the appearance of many problems inside our societies and communities, and the awareness of the emergence, people have increased the objectives of CSR (corporate social responsibility) not only on large companies, although also a lot more on pioneeringup-and-coming ones. Inside the context in the current contemporary society and economic system, especially in designed economies, internet marketers are expected to obtain higher determination to social responsibilities.

Before this kind of topic could be discussed comprehensive, the first question being answered is definitely " Who is an entrepreneur? " The definition may differ between several groups of students. The explanations of entrepreneurship currently being talked about by scholars are focusing on the functional level, after shifting in the analysis of individuals. Here are three main explanations: Gartner's (1988) " Entrepreneurship is the creation of new organization", Venkataraman's (1997) " Entrepreneurship as a scholarly field looks for to understand how opportunities to take into existence 'future' services and goods are learned, created and exploited, by simply whom, and with what consequences". Entrepreneurship Division's (2002) wide-ranging coverage in commercial actions, " The Entrepreneurship Division's domain is the creation and management of new business, small businesses and friends and family firms, as well as the characteristics and special complications of business owners... " The definitions format the range of entrepreneurship, along with suggesting some of the essential contributions and values of entrepreneurs, the creation of something new, new value, advancement, etc .

In this paper, another suggested definition can be adopted, which in turn puts entrepreneurship in a wider context of the social and economic environment, to be able to facilitate the examination of entrepreneurs' roles in economy and society. " Entrepreneurship consists of individuals and groups of persons seeking and exploiting economic opportunity" (McKenzie, Ugbah and Smothers, 2007).

Just lately, due to the function of internet marketers focusing more on interpersonal aspects, your research of sociable entrepreneur is of greater fascination for many scholars and research workers. Similarly, the definition of social entrepreneurs has been debated. Considering the aim of this kind of paper should be to examine the contributions of entrepreneurs, a broader description is followed which pertains social entrepreneurship to individuals or perhaps organizations involved in entrepreneurial activities with a social goal. (Certo & Miller et ing. 2008, cited by Mitra & Borza, 2011)

In this daily news, there is no make an effort to distinguish the social businessman from the business entrepreneur, considering that the different product labels do not suggest greatly distinct contributions. The difference is more about the objective or individual objective, instead of their advantages. (In truth, many recognized social business owners do not realize or agree they are in this...

References: Baumol, T., 1990. Entrepreneurship: productive, unsuccessful, and dangerous. Journal of Political Economic climate, 98 (5), pp. 893–921.

Brouwer, G., De Kok, J., Fris, P., 2006. Can firm age take into account productivity variations? EIM SCALES-paper N200421, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.

Burgess, S., Isle, J., and Stevens, D., 2000. Task flows, employee flows, and churching. Record of Labor Economics, 18(3), pp. 473-502.

Fölster, H., 2008. 'Do entrepreneurs design jobs? '. Small Business Economics, 4(2), pp. 137-148.

Frey, B. H., Benz, M., 2003. Getting independent is a great thing: Very subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. CESifo Working Conventional paper #959, Munich, Germany.

Gartner, W. M., 1988. 'Who is a business person? ' is a wrong query. American Diary of Small enterprise, 12(4), pp. 11-32.

Area, J. E., Daneke, G. A., Lenox, M. M., 2010. Environmentally friendly development and entrepreneurship: Previous contributions and future directions, Journal of Business Going, 25, pp. 439–448.

McKenzie, B., Ugbah, S. D., Smothers, D., 2007. 'Who is a business person? ' Can it be still an incorrect question? Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(1).

Mitra, C. S., Borza, A., 2011. Social entrepreneurship and sociable personality: comparison study. Managing & Promoting, 6(2), pp. 243-254.

Mueller, P., Stel, A. Versus., Storey, G., 2008. The consequences of new company formation upon regional expansion over time: The truth of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30, pp. 59-71.

Murillo, D., Exuberante, J. M., 2006. SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Diary of Business Ethics, 67 (3), pp. 227 - 240.

Praag, C. Meters. and Versloot, P. L., 2008. The Economic Rewards and Costs of Entrepreneurship: A Review of the investigation. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(2).

RodrГ­guez, A. C., Molina, M. A., PГ©rez, A. L. G., and HernГЎndez, U. M., 2003. Size, age and activity sector on the growth of the small and medium firm size. Small Business Economics, 21(3), pp. 289-307.

Seelos, C., Mair, M., 2005. Interpersonal entrepreneurship: Creating new business versions to serve the poor. Organization Horizons, forty eight, pp. 241-246.

Short, L. C., Moss, T. Watts., Lumpkin, G. T., 2009. Research in social entrepreneurship: past advantages and foreseeable future opportunities. Tactical Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, pp. 161-194.

Spence, L., Schmidpeter, R. and Habisch, A., 2003, Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Businesses in Indonesia and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics 47(1), pp. 17–29.

The entire body Shop established website, http://www.thebodyshop.co.uk/services/aboutus_company.aspx [accessed 10th January, 2012]

Thompson, T

Van Ryzin, G. G., Grossman, H., DiPadova-Stocks, T., Bergrud, E., 2009. Face of the cultural entrepreneur: record evidence coming from a US panel. Voluntas, 20, pp. 129-140.

Venkataraman, S., 97. The exclusive domain of entrepreneurship study. In J. Katz (Ed. ), Developments in Entrepreneurship, Firm Introduction and Development, 3, pp. 119-138.

Wennekers, S., Vehicle Stel, A., Thrurik, R., and Reynolds, P., 2005. Nascent entrepreneurship and the degree of economic advancement. Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp. 293-309.


Apathy plus the Media Dissertation

The Betrothed Essay